Public accountability
See the pattern, not just the promise.
Live counts show what CommonProof checks, where verdicts land, and which review process was used.
Updated from the public CommonProof archive.
Claims by political subject
Unclear56 reviews · 72%
Republican16 reviews · 21%
Bipartisan3 reviews · 4%
Nonpartisan/Other2 reviews · 3%
Democratic1 review · 1%
Verdict distribution
Supported63 reviews · 81%
Mostly supported6 reviews · 8%
Not enough evidence5 reviews · 6%
Unsupported2 reviews · 3%
False1 review · 1%
Misleading1 review · 1%
Review process
Legacy AI-assisted evidence review55 reviews · 71%
AI-assisted perspective review23 reviews · 29%
What these numbers mean
Counts are not quotas. CommonProof does not force equal numbers of claims or favorable verdicts for either party. Newsworthiness determines selection; the shared source record determines the conclusion. “Unclear” means the claim is not fairly attributable to one party.
New reviews use the AI-assisted Three-Review System. Older reviews remain labeled as legacy evidence reviews unless they are rerun through the newer process.
Read the full methodology