Public accountability
See the pattern, not just the promise.
Live counts show what CommonProof checks, where verdicts land, and which review process was used.
Updated from the public CommonProof archive.
Claims by political subject
Unclear61 reviews · 92%
Republican5 reviews · 8%
Verdict distribution
Supported53 reviews · 80%
Mostly supported7 reviews · 11%
Not enough evidence4 reviews · 6%
Unsupported2 reviews · 3%
Review process
Legacy AI-assisted evidence review60 reviews · 91%
AI-assisted perspective review6 reviews · 9%
What these numbers mean
Counts are not quotas. CommonProof does not force equal numbers of claims or favorable verdicts for either party. Newsworthiness determines selection; the shared source record determines the conclusion. “Unclear” means the claim is not fairly attributable to one party.
New reviews use the AI-assisted Three-Review System. Older reviews remain labeled as legacy evidence reviews unless they are rerun through the newer process.
Read the full methodology