All statesGeneral election · November 3, 2026
Oregon
Every certified statewide question and statewide race, translated into everyday language and linked to its official source.
Completed sections stay visible while CommonProof checks the next official record.
Ballot measure · CertifiedIP 2028-019: Eligible retailers and wholesalers may be licensed to sell distilled liquor; retailers taxed on sales
This measure would change Oregon liquor law. It would let certain retailers and wholesalers get licenses to sell distilled liquor, instead of keeping bottle sales only through OLCC-regulated liquor stores.
Read the breakdown
IP 2028-019: Eligible retailers and wholesalers may be licensed to sell distilled liquor; retailers taxed on sales
This measure would change Oregon liquor law. It would let certain retailers and wholesalers get licenses to sell distilled liquor, instead of keeping bottle sales only through OLCC-regulated liquor stores.
Official ballot wording
Certified ballot title: Eligible retailers and wholesalers may be licensed to sell distilled liquor; retailers taxed on sales. The certified ballot title PDF states that the Oregon Elections Division received a certified ballot title from the Attorney General on August 31, 2026, for Initiative Petition 2028-019, proposed for the November 7, 2028, General Election.
A YES vote would authorize licensed sales of liquor by certain retail stores eligible to sell beer and wine, and by wholesalers; it would let retailers set prices and tax retailers on sales.
A NO vote would keep the current system, where bottled liquor is sold only through Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission regulated liquor stores.
Financial impact
Information incomplete. The official source reviewed confirms that fiscal estimates are prepared for qualified statewide measures and are printed in the Voters’ Pamphlet, but I did not find the finalized measure-specific fiscal estimate for this item in the sources reviewed.
Supporters’ strongest case
From the certified ballot title record, the strongest official sourced support in the file is that the measure would expand licensed sales to certain retailers and wholesalers and let retailers set prices. The record does not include a final voter pamphlet arguments section in the sources reviewed, so I am not adding unsourced supporter claims.
Opponents’ strongest case
From the certified ballot title record and comment letter, the strongest official sourced opposition in the file is concern that the measure’s tax and revenue effects may be unclear or incomplete. The Attorney General declined proposed changes that would have added more detail about revenue caps or lower retail prices, saying those effects were too speculative or not clearly defined in the measure text.
Key facts
- Official measure record: Petition 2028-019.
- The Elections Division record says sponsorship signatures were verified on 07/23/2026 and the certified ballot title was received on 08/31/2026.
- The certified title is in the measure file PDF.
- The ballot title record says the measure is a statutory initiative.
- The official Secretary of State pages say qualified statewide measures receive explanatory statements and fiscal estimates in the State Voters’ Pamphlet.
Inspect the sources
OfficialOregon Secretary of State — Initiatives, Referendums, Referrals & Recall↗OfficialOregon Secretary of State — General Election: November 3, 2026 Voters’ Pamphlets↗OfficialOregon Secretary of State — Follow the Financial Estimate and Explanatory Statement Process↗OfficialOregon Secretary of State — Certified Ballot Title PDF for Petition 2028-019↗OfficialOregon Secretary of State — Draft Ballot Title / Comments PDF for Petition 2028-019↗Last checked September 3, 2026 at 12:00 AM. AI-drafted from official election sources. Always confirm your sample ballot with your state or local election office.